Some patent applicants and patent owners (“entities”) qualify for a discount on patent fees charged by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The discount is determined by the status of the entity as defined by the USPTO.
Patent applicants/owners must designate one of three entity statuses created by the USPTO to determine fees due: large (undiscounted), small, or micro.
Who has a duty of disclosure?
The duty of disclosure falls on everyone associated with the preparation, filing, or prosecution of a patent application. This includes:
- Each inventor named in the application,
- Each attorney or agent who prepares or prosecutes the application, and
- Every other person (i) who is substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of the application and (ii) who is associated with the inventor, the applicant, an assignee, or anyone to whom there is an obligation to assign the application.
How do I meet the duty of disclosure?
The duty of disclosure is accomplished by submitting an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) containing the material information to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
The duty of disclosure continues throughout the life of a patent application; anytime new information is discovered (for example, cited in a related patent application or foreign counterpart patent application), this information should be disclosed to the USPTO in a timely manner.
What is an Information Disclosure Statement?
An Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) is a form filed with the USPTO in a U.S. patent application listing information that may be material to the patentability of the subject application (i.e., relevant information) that is known to individuals associated with that patent application.
Do I need to file an IDS in all U.S. patent applications?
The duty of disclosure only exists for U.S. nonprovisional patent applications, i.e., utility, design, and plant patent applications. Thus, an IDS only needs to be filed in a U.S. nonprovisional patent application.
- An IDS may not be filed in a U.S. provisional patent application.
Do I have to search for references to disclose?
No searching is necessary; however, if a search has been performed, the relevant references found in the search must be disclosed.
Do I have to disclose relevant information?
Yes. Disclosure of relevant information is compulsory in order for a patent application to proceed to grant; failure to disclose all known information material to patentability may result in refusal to grant a patent or cancellation of a granted patent for violation of the duty of disclosure through bad faith or intentional misconduct.
Disclosing information to the USPTO is not construed to be an admission that the information is, or is considered to be, material to patentability. Disclosure is required by the USPTO to assure good faith in the application proceedings.
What kind of information should be disclosed?
Information that is “material to patentability” should be disclosed. Information is “material to patentability” if it is relevant to the invention claimed in your patent application; that is if the information establishes a prima facie case of patentability.
This information includes patents, patent applications, patent application publications, products, and any other publication (e.g., articles, research papers, videos, books, products, etc.) relevant to the claimed invention.
- If a reference is a patent or published patent application, it will need to be disclosed if the filing date of the patent or published application predates the filing date or priority date of your patent application.
- If the reference is non-patent literature (books, articles, products, etc.), it should be disclosed if the first date the item was published, offered for sale, used, or known predates the filing date or priority date of your patent application.
Can I file more than one IDS?
You can file more than one IDS in a single patent application, and it is common to file more than one IDS throughout the prosecution of a U.S. patent application. There are several reasons to file more than one IDS, which you should discuss with your patent attorney.
Is there a government fee to file an IDS?
Sometimes a government fee must be paid when filing an IDS, but it depends on when the IDS is filed (see below). The government fee ranges from $52 to $260, depending on the entity status of the patent applicant.
When should I file an IDS?
You can file an IDS at any time during the pendency of a patent application. It’s best to meet the duty of disclosure within one of the following windows to avoid a government fee:
- Within three (3) months of filing an application
- Within three (3) months of when new information is made known to an individual associated with the patent application
- Within three (3) months of when the information was cited in a counterpart foreign patent application
It is possible to disclose information after these time periods with the payment of a USPTO fee. However, if you file an IDS after three months from the application filing date but before a first Office Action, no fee is due.
You never know when the USPTO will issue the first Office Action, so the sooner an IDS is filed, the better!
*The information on this webpage is not legal advice and should not be relied on. The content of this webpage is for informational purposes only and is meant as a starting point in your search for answers to your legal questions.
Wes and the Gallium Law team have been a pleasure to work with. They guided us seamlessly through the provisional patent process for our product, providing expert advice and prompt communication at every step. I highly recommend them to any startup or business looking for strategic, dependable IP counsel. Looking forward to continuing our partnership!

Mike L.
via Google
I called several firms about assisting me with developing my patent and the Gallium Law firm was only one, nationwide, to return my phone call and consult with me. That is respect no matter what IP you have, or who you are. They are very professional and takes care of their customers. The work was thorough and detailed. I am very satisfied with the work they have done for me. I would recommend this law firm to anyone reading.

Shawn
via Google
I highly recommend Gallium Law for your company's patent needs. Wes and crew are a stellar team that helped us get our product design utility patent successfully patented with the USPTO. After they drafted the patent application and materials, it was clear that having expert professionals craft the application was absolutely necessary. There are countless details in how they executed the application that we never would have been able to do ourselves. They did a tremendous job in taking the patent to the finish line.

Robert P.
via Google
The Gallium team have been and continue to be phenomenal partners to work with. They have been the most responsive, creative, engaging, and innovative IP counsel I have ever collaborated with. Gallium is happy to support early stage start-ups and provide the same attention and support you would typically only receive when working for large multi-nationals. I would recommend their team to anyone looking to generate and expand their IP portfolio.

Ryan B.
via Google
Great experience! The Gallium team did a great job filing my patent. They also did a great job of clearly explaining my options to protect my IP, and that made a big difference to me as a new inventor.

Daniel B.
via Google
I have worked with Gallium law for many years. In my opinion they are unique in their approach of "winning" patents for customers like myself. I worked very close with their professional patent law attorneys, and turned obstacles and initial rejections to complete successful patent allowances. They are very reasonable with their budgets and willing to accommodate your personal needs and requests. It is the best patent law company I ever dealt with.

Gideon E.
via Google
Our publicly traded company has worked with Wes and his team at Gallium Law for about a decade. They are consummate IP professionals and highly organized - which is essential for coordinating dates, fees, etc. We trust Gallium Law with our most highly prized assets - our IP. You should, too.

David M.
via Google
Gallium Law is an incredible Intellectual Property Legal team! I am continually blown away with their ability to translate our medical device design ideas into patent claims and diagrams. They are very experienced in the interventional (catheters and generators) medical device space. My customers have had great experiences working with Gallium and I recommend them to all medical device innovators.

Brady H.
via Google
I have always been very happy with the great work of the Gallium team. They are patent experts who really take an interest in helping their clients succeed. Wes is particularly talented and results oriented. Not only is Wes an excellent patent attorney, he's also a great engineer with an MBA, so he understands legal issues from many useful perspectives.

Eric W.
via Google
I thoroughly enjoyed working with the Gallium Law team on my provisional patent application and intend to work with them on future filings. Wes and Isabel were knowledgeable and cared about understanding my intellectual property. I appreciated their advice on filing timelines and drafting strategy. I highly recommend their firm.
